Author Topic: Andrew  (Read 869 times)

caminito

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1904
Re: Andrew
« Reply #15 on: March 13, 2011, 01:58:32 PM »
The job he has always done  ::)
Parasite
def..a person who receives support, advantage, or the like, from another or others without giving any useful or proper return, as one who lives on the hospitality of others.

avalonmpk2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 607
Re: Andrew
« Reply #16 on: March 13, 2011, 03:47:05 PM »
How about ADC to Gordon Brown?

caminito

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1904
Re: Andrew
« Reply #17 on: March 13, 2011, 05:17:04 PM »
quote ....
Courtiers have already put feelers out to find another role for the Duke that would enable him to step down “with dignity”.

crikey , he is getting more like Peter Mandelson every day  ???


avalonmpk2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 607
Re: Andrew
« Reply #18 on: March 13, 2011, 10:37:04 PM »
What - a two faced socialist - with more money than sense?

Chrisjay

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2809
Re: Andrew
« Reply #19 on: March 14, 2011, 09:41:04 AM »
and poor taste in women with totally spoilt daughters
 

caminito

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1904
Re: Andrew
« Reply #20 on: May 08, 2011, 07:58:49 PM »

How dare they criticize a royal . Off with his head  ;D

A Labour MP who has been ‘gagged’ by the Commons Speaker to stop him raising questions about Prince Andrew’s conduct is planning to use a ‘nuclear option’ to get round the ban.

Speaker John Bercow last week barred Paul Flynn from debating the Duke of York’s controversial performance as the UK’s special trade envoy, citing a rule banning MPs from criticising the Royal Family.

Now Mr Flynn is vowing to sidestep the ‘archaic’ convention, which dates from the 13th Century, by garnering backbench support for a Commons motion that would effectively censure Andrew.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1384755/MP-defy-800-year-old-rule-attack-Prince-Andrew-House-Commons.html#ixzz1LmxxUZgI