At the moment the BBC and Nick Robinson are going around the country asking people what THEY would cut if they had the power to do it.
The thing is that the questions that are being asked are "engineered" to put the people into very difficult choices that they might not have taken if they had had a wider remit.
The latest question Nick Robinson asked, yesterday, was: Would you cut welfare benefits so as to save any cuts on health and education. Of course the people who asked that were on benefits said NO and the people who were not on benefits said YES. How twisted is that then ?
I visited the BBC NEWS Politics page and found a similar set of questions with a slider on each option showing what would happen if certain cuts were made on certain sections of government spending.
As with the questions that were being asked out on the road these questions were formulated to force the person to make narrow choices of "either/or" rather than let them say where they would want specific cuts to fall.
No options were given to cut spending by cutting waste or by getting rid of quangos or by ditching Trident or by taxing the rich more than they already are.
Because of these VERY
directed and steered questions the people were forced to make decisions that were unfair and myopic.
In my estimation,
NOT a representative result !
HERE is the BBC NEWS page where you can try this narrow view yourself.
Come back and tell us what you think in this thread.