I am getting loads of mail about retirement villages.
Dad lived in a 4 bedroom house till he was 94.
Surely there is no need to go in to a retirement village till you are 95.
Brian,
Good topic again, but I must correct you on one thing, 95 is far to young to consider going in a Retirement Home, should there be alternatives.
Which brings me to my Bete Noir - House Blocking.
I am fed up to the back teeth with radio and tv programmes telling me that something must be done about pensioners living in four bedroom detached homes with barely a single bedroom in use.
F*** Y** I shout out.
Why-ever should I move. There is nothing more ideal (given my financial circumstances) than the home I currently live in.
What would me wife and myself do with sixteen hours a day in a Retirement Home with nothing to do but play bingo - we'd be suicidal.
There is one, and only one, compelling reason to move to a Retirement Home, and that is because you are infirm and can't afford to pay others to do jobs around the house for you. We'll be sticking with what we've got, and I'll pay someone to clean and do our laundry and do the garden, when we're not fit enough to do it ourselves.
Aside from our preference, there's simply nothing more suitable - we chose the house because of its suitability, we see nothing more convenient, better equipped, and close to the thing we use than where we live currently.
Why would I want to exchange the prospect of three hours a day in my own garden, for three mis-spent hours a day in a retirement home.
None of the rubbish being pushed at us by YOUNG journalists makes sense to us, but we see the LIES they spew out make sense to YOUNG journalists.