From time to time when some companies have lost or not made profits the top person of that company either ends up getting a massive pay off for miss, or bad management, or alternatively retains his/her position and get a Hugh salary increase instead,
so I wonder if where share holders are involved do they either lose out as shares drop,
in the past many so called C.E.O,s where as in the past salary increases were paid on results not failures.
of course it all depends on what's written into the small print when it comes to contracts ,
for the average worker much lower down the pay scales poor results usually end up in having to look for another job,
Q; do you have any views regarding people getting paid too much for poor results, if so what should or could be done about it ,rather than pay more money to a person who had made more money for their company instead,.