Author Topic: Deportation  (Read 791 times)

klondike

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2221
Re: Deportation
« Reply #30 on: Feb 11, 2020, 06:22:54 PM »
Doesn't say much for Labour that she's still Shadow Home Sec..
I'm glad she is. The loonier they look the less folk will be daft enough to try to put them in power. I assume that when Corbyn shuffles off to spend more time with his marrows she will return to the back benches.

Ashy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 22330
Re: Deportation
« Reply #31 on: Feb 11, 2020, 07:54:42 PM »
Oh, pity the poor marrows.
Remainers have the rest of 2020 to transition to rejoiners

klondike

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2221
Re: Deportation
« Reply #32 on: Feb 11, 2020, 08:23:07 PM »
They seem happy enough..



Diasi

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7613
Re: Deportation
« Reply #33 on: Feb 12, 2020, 06:57:22 AM »
Well it'll not be much different from spending time on the front bench with his melons.
Make every day count, each day is precious.

Brexit Has Happened.

Ashy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 22330
Re: Deportation
« Reply #34 on: Feb 12, 2020, 10:17:12 AM »
Yes the melon diet appears to be working there.
Remainers have the rest of 2020 to transition to rejoiners

Johned

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3933
Re: Deportation
« Reply #35 on: Feb 12, 2020, 12:39:33 PM »
What was that vintage comedian's catchphrase "Ooh, the size of it?"

zoony

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46597
Re: Deportation
« Reply #36 on: Feb 12, 2020, 12:49:51 PM »
"All that meat an' no bread.."?
" There ain't no Devil, it's jus' God when he's drunk.."

Tom Waites

crabbyob

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13730
Re: Deportation
« Reply #37 on: Feb 12, 2020, 12:54:44 PM »
so did it take off?
every hill has a down side, even Benny Hill

Alex22

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11091
Re: Deportation
« Reply #38 on: Feb 12, 2020, 04:07:01 PM »
It did Crabby, but only with 17 people on board, what a waste eh ?

Hugh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6040
Re: Deportation
« Reply #39 on: Feb 12, 2020, 04:14:59 PM »
Yet again the courts are poking their noses in and wasting tax payers money. The rest of the party will soon follow even if Corbyn trying to block it.

zoony

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46597
Re: Deportation
« Reply #40 on: Feb 12, 2020, 04:25:07 PM »
You either have Law and follow it or you don't and enjoy the anarchy of everybody choosing to obey the bits they approve of and bugger the bits they don't.
" There ain't no Devil, it's jus' God when he's drunk.."

Tom Waites

Diasi

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7613
Re: Deportation
« Reply #41 on: Feb 13, 2020, 07:40:27 AM »
Yet again the courts are poking their noses in and wasting tax payers money. The rest of the party will soon follow even if Corbyn trying to block it.

It's only a delaying tactic as no law was broken as all the deportations were within the law.

It seems to be as a result of some of the criminals, who were being deported, not having a mobile phone signal so they couldn't call advice centres & the Home Office to discuss their case.

They're now back in detention & will have access to a mobile phone signal so they can phone for advice etc & at the end of the due process the Home Office will still deport them.
Make every day count, each day is precious.

Brexit Has Happened.

Michael Rolls

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16279
Re: Deportation
« Reply #42 on: Feb 13, 2020, 08:06:52 AM »
And about time!
Mike
The older I get, the better I was!

klondike

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2221
Re: Deportation
« Reply #43 on: Feb 13, 2020, 09:03:27 AM »
At significant additional cost too.

Michael Rolls

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16279
Re: Deportation
« Reply #44 on: Feb 13, 2020, 09:12:13 AM »
The 25 who have managed to get their deportation delayed included one person convicted of manslaughter, two rapists, seven convicted for crimes of violence, the rest include convictions for firearms offences, burglary and 14 drug dealers - just the sort of diversity we so badly need in this country.
The grounds for the appeal? An O2 signal failure on the (from memory) 3rd of February meant that they were unable to obtain adequate legal advice.
Does anybody really believe such a story - a story unprovable - for how do you disprove the claim 'my phone wouldn't work and therefore......' And how come they couldn't get the advice after the service failure was rectified?
Another example of the judiciary bending over backwards to find even the mist ridiculous reasons for being nice to the scum infecting our streets
Mike
The older I get, the better I was!