Author Topic: Deal or No Deal Show Win Fiddle  (Read 1193 times)


  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 693
Deal or No Deal Show Win Fiddle
« on: Mar 22, 2009, 03:04:02 PM »
Did anyone see the second 250,000 being won?

I did not see the first being won, but that was a matter that there was very little to
loose in taking the gamble.

The second was unfair to anyone not being allowed to come back into the game (after dealing)
when there is 250,000 left.

To bring back someone who had dealt at 17,500 to be allowed to win 250,000 and then
winning it was a fiddle to allow a winner.

Perhaps this was a production move to boost interest? Perhaps only having one 'jackpot'
winner in a thousand shows (next week) did not sound too good.

It seems the only way to get on the show is to have some tale of woe.

Even the audience have to wear black as if in mourning...
« Last Edit: Mar 22, 2009, 05:01:22 PM by John »


  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 17
Re: Deal or No Deal Show Win Fiddle
« Reply #1 on: Mar 25, 2009, 03:05:45 PM »
I don't generally watch this programme but I was at a friend's house when the second jackpot was won. I didn't know that anything different had occured. It was pretty exciting though but not enough to get me to watch it regularly.


If a smile is your unbrella, pretty soon you'll have a faceful of rain!


  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Re: Deal or No Deal Show Win Fiddle
« Reply #2 on: Apr 25, 2009, 09:56:58 PM »
I agree, it was very odd.