Diasi....what a ridiculous comparison of cases. I suggest you follow the case from the beginning with all the evidence and reports. Stuart was raped and murdered read the medical evidence.
Who needs trial & a jury with you on the case.
That's not what the defence will say if the case gets to court.
The defence will put it to the jury that Lubbock was a gay, whose's injuries would appear to be anorectal & consistent with a vigorous 'handballing' session, in which he was a willing participant.
I'd be surprised if Cassandra didn't agree that the defence could proceed on that basis.
There may well be facts, about his private life of which no one was aware, that come out in court.